Department of Math and Computer Science
Problems of the Month 2004

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Nov Dec



Problem for 2004 January

Proposed by Matthew Hubbard

There are three non-abelian groups of order 12:

i.
the symmetries of the tetrahedron, A4;
ii.
the dihedral group of the hexagon, D6; and
iii.
a group known as T or as Q6, which has generators a and b with relations
a6=1, b2=a3=(ab)2.
Since each of these is of order 12, each can be embedded in the symmetric group S12.
It is well-known that A4 can be embedded in S4 and D6 can be embedded in S6.


What is the least n such that Q6 can be embedded in Sn?




Solution by the proposer



Since a is a permutation of order six it must be a disjoint union of 6-cycles, 3-cycles, and 2-cycles; if there is no 6-cycle, there must be at least one 3-cycle and one 2-cycle, and a3 is made up of disjoint 2-cycles. Since b is of order four it is made up of disjoint 4-cycles and 2-cycles, and b2 is made up of disjoint 2-cycles generated by the 4-cycles of b; likewise, ab is of order four, and (ab)2 is made up of disjoint 2-cycles. The smallest number of elements we can use to create a, b, and ab meeting our criteria is seven, and an example follows.
a
=(123)(46)(57),   so a3=(46)(57)
b
=(12)(4567),      so b2=(46)(57)
ab
=(13)(4765),   so (ab)2=(46)(57)
All the generating relations are satisfied, so a and b generate Q6.




Problem for 2004 February

Proposed by Dan Jurca

Problem number 174 (from Murray Klamkin) in the book Which Way did the Bicycle Go? by Joseph D. E. Konhauser, Dan Velleman, and Stan Wagon appears as follows.


Find, with an error of no more than 5%, the numerical value of
ó
õ
100

1 
xx dx.
The answer 1.80086·10199 is given on page 211.


Find a more accurate approximation.
Precisely, find an approximation A of the above integral I with a relative error less than 10-6; i.e., we require
 |I-A|

I
< 10-6.



Solution by the proposer


We begin by observing (xx)¢=xx(1+lnx), and next by l'Hôpital's rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus

lim
x®¥ 
ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt

xx/(1+lnx)
=
lim
x®¥ 
(1+lnx) ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt

xx
=
lim
x®¥ 
 1

x
ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt+xx(1+lnx)

xx(1+lnx)
=1+
lim
x®¥ 
ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt

x·xx(1+lnx)
=1+
lim
x®¥ 
 xx

xx(1+lnx)+x[xx(1+lnx)2+xx-1]
=1+0
=1.
One writes
ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt ~  xx

1+lnx
,
and this suggests that for large x one may approximate
ó
õ
x

1 
tt dt
with xx/(1+lnx); for example
ó
õ
100

1 
tt dt »  100100

1+ln100
=  10200

1+ln100
» 1.7841×10199.
This approximation, however motivated, provides no information about the error of the approximation; hence we argue as follows.

For each a, 1 < a < 100, we write
ia= ó
õ
a

1 
xx dx   and    Ia= ó
õ
100

a 
xx dx.
Then obviously
I
= ó
õ
100

1 
xx dx
= ó
õ
a

1 
xx dx +  ó
õ
100

a 
xx dx
=ia+Ia,   and
ia
< (a-1)·aa.
(We shall later choose a=e4.5 » 90.02, and then ia < 7.5×10177. Hence it will remain to approximate Ia.)

Next with u1=1/(1+lnx) and dv=xx(1+lnx) dx we have
du1=-  1

x(1+lnx)2
 dx   and    v=xx,
so using integration by parts
Ia=xx·  1

1+lnx
ê
ê
100

a 
 +  ó
õ
100

a 
 1

x(1+lnx)2
·xx dx;
now with u2=1/[x(1+lnx)3] and dv as before we have
du2=-  4+lnx

x2(1+lnx)4
 dx   and    v as before,
so again using integration by parts
Ia=xx æ
è
 1

1+lnx
+  1

x(1+lnx)3
ö
ø
ê
ê
100

a 
 +  ó
õ
100

a 
 4+lnx

x2(1+lnx)4
·xx dx;
finally, with u3=(4+lnx)/[x2(1+lnx)5] and dv as before,
du3=-  27+14lnx+2(lnx)2

x3(1+lnx)6
 dx   and    v as before,
so once again using integration by parts
Ia=xx æ
è
 1

1+lnx
+  1

x(1+lnx)3
+  4+lnx

x2(1+lnx)5
ö
ø
ê
ê
100

a 
 +  ó
õ
100

a 
 27+14lnx+2(lnx)2

x3(1+lnx)6
·xx dx.
Now with j:[a,100]®R by
j(x)
=  27+14lnx+2(lnx)2

x3(1+lnx)6
we find   j¢(x)
=-  229+189lnx+56(lnx)2+6(lnx)3

x4(1+lnx)7
so that j¢ < 0 whence j\searrow, and jmax=j(a); therefore
ó
õ
100

a 
j(x)·xx dx < j(a) ó
õ
100

a 
xx dx=j(a)Ia.
Now let
Aa=xx é
ë
 1

1+lnx
+  1

x(1+lnx)3
+  4+lnx

x2(1+lnx)5
ù
û
100

a 
;
then we have Aa < Ia < Aa+j(a)Ia, and we shall show that Ae4.5 is a sufficiently accurate approximation of I.

Now clearly Aa < ia+Aa < ia+Ia=I, so that 0 < I-Aa and |I-Aa|=I-Aa.

Next, I=ia+Ia < ia+Aa+j(a)Ia, so I-Aa < ia+j(a)Ia. It therefore follows that
 |I-Aa|

I
=  I-Aa

I
<  ia+j(a)Ia

I
=  ia

I
+j(a)  Ia

I
<  ia

Aa
+j(a),
since Aa < I and Ia < I.

Now with a=e4.5 we recall ia < 7.5×10177 and find (using a HP-42S calculator) that
Aa
» 1.784636555×10199
so that  ia

Aa
< 5×10-22
andj(a)
» 6.46336778×10-9,
so that     |I-Aa|

I
< 7×10-9.
Hence we have I » 1.7846366×10199 with a relative error less than 5×10-8, so that each digit in this approximation is significant.




Problem for 2004 March

Communicated by Dan Jurca

Suppose a Î R, b Î R, a < b, f:[a,b]®R, and
x Î [a,b] Þ 0 < f¢¢(x).
Find all values c Î [a,b] such that the area of the region bounded by

the graph of y=f(x),
the line tangent to the graph at the point (c,f(c)), and
the lines x=a and x=b is minimum.



Solution by Kurt Luoto




Problem for 2004 April

Communicated by Dan Jurca

According to the 2004 March issue of the Canadian mathematics journal Crux Mathematicorum the following problem appeared in the 2003 Croatian Mathematical Society National Competition, Junior Level.

Prove that if the product of the positive real numbers x, y, and z is equal to 1, and
x+y+z £  1

x
+  1

y
+  1

z
,
then for each nonnegative integer n
xn+yn+zn £  1

xn
+  1

yn
+  1

zn
.


Solution by Dan Jurca



Assume 0 < x £ y £ z, so that x £ 1, else 1 < xyz. Since xyz=1, we have z=1/(xy); next from
x+y+  1

xy
£  1

x
+  1

y
+xy   we have
x2y+xy2+1
£ y+x+x2y2,   so
0
£ (x2-x)y2-(x2-1)y+(x-1)   whence
0
£ (x-1)[xy2-(x+1)y+1].
Now if x=1, then yz=1 so z=1/y and the inequality to be shown becomes simply yn+(1/y)n £ 1/(yn)+yn, which is obvious; hence assume x < 1. Now xy2-(x+1)y+1=0 iff y=1 or y=1/x, so since xy2-(x+1)y+1 £ 0, we deduce that 1 £ y £ 1/x.

Now suppose a is a positive real number, let S={(u,v) Î R2 | 0 < u £and  1 £ v £ 1/u}, and consider f:S®R by f(u,v)=ua+va+1/(uv)a-1/ua-1/va-(uv)a. We observe that (x,y) Î S and
f(u,1)
=0,
f æ
è
u,  1

u
ö
ø
=0;   and
1 < v Þ 
lim
u®0+ 
f(u,v)
=-¥,   and
 f

u
(u,v)
=aua-1-a  1

ua+1va
+a  1

ua+1
-aua-1va
=  a(1-va)

ua+1va
[(uv)a ua-1],
and since 1-va £ 0 and (uv)a ua-1 £ 0, it follows that 0 £ f/u, so that for each v0, 1 < v0, the function g:(0,1/v0]®R by g(u)=f(u,v0) increases from -¥ at 0+ to 0 at 1/v0, so we have f(u,v) £ 0 for each (u,v) Î S. Hence (with u=x and v=y)
xa+ya+  1

(xy)a
£  1

xa
+  1

ya
+(xy)a,
and the desired inequality holds for each nonnegative real number n.




Problem for 2004 May

Communicated by Matthew Hubbard

This problem appeared in the MSRI newsletter.

There are 101 points (ants) on the interval [0,1], and one of them, call it p*, is at 1/2. Each point has its own randomly selected starting direction, either left or right, and each point moves at the rate of one unit per minute. When two points collide they bounce off in opposite directions without losing speed; and when a point collides with an endpoint of the interval, 0 or 1, it bounces back without losing speed.

What is the probability that after one minute p* is back at the point 1/2?


Solution by Kurt Luoto


Imagine that on the head of each ant there sits a dust mite. The dust mite rides on the ant’s head until the ant collides with another ant, at which time the dust mite jumps onto the head of the other ant (i.e. the dust mites on the two colliding ants trade places).  If over time we track the position of mite mi (1 £ i £ 101) which starts out on the head of ant pi at position ai, we see that the mite initially travels in the same direction as the ant pi and continues in that direction as it hops from ant to ant until at some point the ant it is traveling on collides with one of the endpoints 0 or 1 at which point the mite’s direction changes. Note that the mites travel at the same speed as the ants (one unit per minute). For example, after two minutes the mite mi is back at its original position, ai and therefore there must be an ant at each of the original positions, and since the order of the ants on the interval never changes, this means that each ant is back at its original position after two minutes.

 

Now after one minute, the mite mi is at position (1 - ai), so there must be some ant at position (1 - ai) after one minute. In other words, the distribution of the ants on [0,1] at one minute is the mirror image, reflected around the point ½, of their distribution at the starting time. Since p* started at position ½, that means that there is some ant at position ½ after one minute, though this will be p* if and only if p* is the middle ant, i.e. the 51st ant counting from the left. Thus the probability that p* is back at its starting position after one minute is exactly the probability that p* is the middle ant.

 

The problem statement does not say how initial positions are determined, but if we assume that the initial positions of the 100 ants other than p* are selected from [0,1] independently from each other with uniform probability across the interval, then this is the probability that exactly 50 of the ants initially start out in the interval [0, ½).
This probability is , which is approximately 0.0795892.




Problem for 2004 June

Communicated by Dan Jurca

According to the 2004 May issue of the Canadian Mathematics journal Crux Mathematicorum the following problem appeared in the National Round of the XXXVI Spanish Mathematical Olympiad.

Show that there exists no function f:N®N such that for each n
f(f(n))=n+1.



Solution by Dan Jurca


Suppose otherwise; i.e., f:N®N and for each n Î N: f(f(n))=n+1. Then
f(f(f(n)))
=f[f(f(n))]=f[n+1]   and
=f(f[f(n)])=f(n)+1,   so that

n Î N Þ f(n+1)=f(n)+1.
It follows by an easy induction on k that 1 £Þ f(n+k)=f(n)+k. Now suppose f(1)=y. Then
f(n)
=f(1+(n-1))
=f(1)+(n-1)
=y+(n-1),   so that
f(n)
=y+n-1;   but then
f(y)
=2y-1   and
f(f(n))
=f(y+n-1)
=f(y)+n-1
=(2y-1)+n-1
=2y+n-2,   and also
f(f(n))
=n+1,   whence
2y+n-2
=n+1,   and
2y
=3,
which contradicts y=f(1) Î N; therefore no such f exists.



Problem for 2004 July

Proposed by Dan Jurca

Suppose that xi Î R for i=1,2,¼,n, and 1 £ xi for each i.

Prove the following.
3n n
Õ
i=1 
(xi2-xi) £ n
Õ
i=1 
(xi3-1)


Solution by the proposer



If t is a nonzero real number, then
t+  1

t
=  t2+1

t
=  2t+t2-2t+1

t
=2+  (t-1)2

t
,   so that if 0 < t, then
2
£ t+  1

t
.   Hence, for each i
3
£ xi+  1

xi
+1   so (since 0 < xi)
3xi
£ xi2+1+xi,   whence (since 0 £ xi-1)
3xi(xi-1)
£ (xi-1)(xi2+xi+1)   so that
3(xi2-xi)
£ xi3-1,
from which, by taking the product of all n factors, the desired inequality follows.


Also solved by Dangthu Ta




Problem for 2004 Aug

Communicated by Dan Jurca

Let P, Q, R, and S be four distinct points on a circle in clockwise order, and let A, B, C, and D be the midpoints of the arcs PQ, QR, RS, and SP, respectively. Prove that the line segments AC and BD are perpendicular.

Diagram

Solution by Massoud Malek


Let X be the point of intersection of line segments AC and BD; then
ÐAXB
=ÐACB+ÐCBD
=p-(ÐCAB+ÐABD),      so that
2ÐAXB
=p+ÐACB+ÐCBD-ÐCAB-ÐABD
=p+
^
AQ
 
+
^
QB
 

2
+
^
CS
 
+
^
SD
 

2
-
^
BR
 
+
^
RC
 

2
-
^
DP
 
+
^
PA
 

2
=p+
^
AQ
 
-
^
PA
 

2
+
^
QB
 
-
^
BR
 

2
+
^
CS
 
-
^
RC
 

2
+
^
SD
 
-
^
DP
 

2
=p+  0

2
+  0

2
+  0

2
+  0

2
=p,
whence ÐAXB=p/2, and line segments AC and BD are perpendicular.


Also solved by Karen Nelson, John M. Sayer, and Sizhuo Shi



Problem for 2004 September and October

Proposed by Dan Jurca

For each positive integer n define S(n) as follows.
S(n)
= n
å
b=2 
logbn
=log2n+log3n+log4n+¼+lognn
Determine whether

lim
n®¥ 
 S(n)

n
exists; and if it exists, determine its value.



Solution by the proposer



We have
S(n)= n
å
b=2 
logbn= n
å
b=2 
 lnn

lnb
=lnn n
å
b=2 
 1

lnb
.
The function (1,¥)®R by t®1/lnt assumes only positive values and strictly decreases, so
1 < x Þ   1

ln(x+1)
< ó
õ
x+1

x 
 dt

lnt
<  1

lnx
;
hence (by summing)
3 £Þ  ó
õ
n

2 
 dt

lnt
+ ó
õ
n+1

n 
 dt

lnt
< n
å
b=2 
 1

lnb
=  1

ln2
+ n
å
b=3 
 1

lnb
<  1

ln2
+ n
å
b=3 
ó
õ
b

b-1 
 dt

lnt
=  1

ln2
+ ó
õ
n

2 
 dt

lnt
whence
3 £Þ   lnn

n
· ó
õ
n

2 
 dt

lnt
<  S(n)

n
<  lnn

n
·  1

ln2
+  lnn

n
· ó
õ
n

2 
 dt

lnt
.
Now

lim
x®¥ 
 lnx

x
=0   and  ó
õ
¥

2 
 dt

lnt
=¥   (since 1 < t Þ   1

t
<  1

lnt
)
so by l'Hôpital's rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus

lim
x®¥ 
 lnx

x
· ó
õ
x

2 
 dt

lnt
=1;
therefore by the squeeze theorem

lim
n®¥ 
 S(n)

n
=1.




Also solved by Dennis Eichhorn and Sarah Frey




Problem for 2004 November

Communicated by Dan Jurca

Show that
  æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5Ö{1+¼}}
 
 
=3.
Remark. This problem probably originated with Ramanujan. For some interesting background material see Robert Kanigel, The Man Who Knew Infinity, page 86.


Solution by Dan Jurca



3
=Ö9
=
Ö
 

1+8
 
=
Ö
 

1+2·4
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2
Ö

16
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2
Ö

1+15
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2
Ö

1+3·5
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

25
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+24
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4·6
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{36}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+35}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5·7}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5Ö{49}}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5Ö{1+48}}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5Ö{1+6·8}}
 
 
=   æ
Ö

1+2   æ
Ö

1+3
Ö

1+4Ö{1+5Ö{1+¼}}
 
 




Problem for 2004 December

Proposed by Bill Nico

Prove that the following construction of a regular pentagon is correct.

1.
Draw a (unit) circle centered at O.
2.
Draw a line (extended diameter) through O meeting the circle in points A and B.
3.
At B construct a perpendicular to the line AOB and mark on it a point C such that length OB= length BC; i.e., 1.
4.
With center A and radius AC draw an arc meeting line AOB in point D (beyond B).
5.
Bisect line segment OD, calling the midpoint E.
6.
Construct the perpendicular bisector of segment OE, calling the midpoint F and the point where the perpendicular bisector meets the circle G.
7.
The chord GB is one side of the pentagon inscribed in the circle; complete it in the obvious way.

Diagram


Solution by Dan Jurca


Since AD=AC=Ö5, we find OF=(AD-AO)/4=( Ö5-1)/4, so that
cosÐBOG=cosÐFOG=( Ö5-1)/4=cos(2 p/5);
therefore BG is one side of a regular pentagon.


Also solved by Shavila Devi, Karen Nelson, and the proposer